Considering user request options
It's now December 2025, and my last knowledge update was in October 2024, so I know my info might be outdated. Since the user provided a headline but didn’t ask me to fetch anything, I should ask if they want more details instead. I could mention Oscar's career and context around heart issues in athletes. Also, I need to confirm which Oscar they mean—perhaps the Brazilian Oscar at Shanghai Port? Let's keep it brief and focused!Compiling health and contract info

I can offer to compile facts if the user shares a link or allows me to fetch information, but I should also remind them about the sensitivity of health information, even if it's public news. I’m thinking of mentioning possible implications regarding his contract and foreign player quotas. The user's mention of Oscar's situation makes me cautious about specifics, so I can provide general analysis and typical medical protocols without going into detail. Also, I should ask for clarification and provide options in a friendly manner.Preparing response options
I should confirm what the user wants: do they need a summary of the report, a timeline, the impact on the team, or information on the athlete's return process regarding heart abnormalities? I can't access the specific article they're referring to, but if they provide a link, I can extract key points. Also, I could summarize common points like when issues were discovered and the club's stance. If they're looking for a quick social media format, I can help with that too! Let's craft some concise options.
你是想看这条报道的要点梳理,还是要我把它改写成一段可直接发布的快讯/推文?另外确认一下:这里的“奥斯卡”是指中超上海海港的巴西中场奥斯卡吗?
先给你一个即用版的简短要点和快讯草稿(不引入未证实细节):
核心要点
50字快讯
200字稿
需要我:
